Version: 0.0.1 | Published: 23 Jan 2023 | Updated: 855 days ago
Data for Figure TS.29 - Technical Summary of the Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
Dataset
Summary
Citation:
Halsnæs, K.; Some, S.; Singh, U.; Clarke, L.; Wei, Y. -M.; Garg, A.; Nabuurs, G.
-J.; Mrabet, R.; Emmet-Booth, J.; Kilkis, S.; Lwasa, S.; Seto, K. C.; Keller,
M.; Pathak, M.; Mirasgedis, S.; Cabeza, L. F.; Bai, Q.; Jaramillo, P.; Ribeiro,
S. K.; Newman, P.; Santos, A.; Nugroho, S. B.; Acquaye, A.; Bashmakov, I. A.;
Nilsson, L. J., 2022, Data for Figure TS.29 - Technical Summary of the Working
Group III Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment
Report, MetadataWorks, https://doi.org/10.48490/71ed-n248
DOI Name:
Documentation
Description:
Figure TS.29: Mitigation options have synergies with many Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but there are trade-offs associated with some options especially when implemented at scale. The synergies and trade-offs vary widely and depend on the context. Figure presents a summary of the chapter level qualitative assessment of the synergies and trade-offs for selected mitigation options. Overlaps may exist in the mitigation options assessed and presented by sector and system, and interlinkages with the SDGs might differ depending on the application of that option by sector. Interactions of mitigation options with the SDGs are context specific and dependent on the scale of implementation. For some mitigation options, these scaling and context-specific issues imply that there are both synergies and trade-offs in relation to specific SDGs. The SDGs are displayed as coloured squares. They indicate whether a synergy, trade-off, or both synergies and trade-offs exist between the SDG and the mitigation option. Confidence levels are indicated through the solidity of the squares. A solid square indicates high confidence, a partially filled square indicates medium confidence, and an outlined square indicates low confidence. The final column in the figure provides a line of sight to the chapters that provide details on context-specificity and scale of implementation. {6.3, 6.4, 6.7, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 8.2, 8.4, 8.6, 9.4, 9.5, 9.8, Table 9.5, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.8, 11.5, Table 10.3, 17.3, Figure 17.1, Supplementary Material Table 17.SM.1, Annex II.IV.12}
Is Part Of:
Technical Summary of Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC AR6
Coverage
Spatial Aggregation:
Global
Spatial Coverage:
Global
Geographic Bounding Box
Lower Left Latitude:
-90.0000
Lower Left Longitude:
-180.0000
Upper Right Latitude:
90.0000
Upper Right Longitude:
180.0000
Provenance
Source:
AR6 WGIII Chapters 6-11, 17 Chapter 6: 6.4.2, 6.7.7, Box 6.1, Figure 6.18
Chapter 7 Sections- 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 Chapter 8 Sections- 8.2, 8.4, 8.6 Chapter
9 Sections- 9.4, 9.5, 9.8, Table 9.5 Chapter 10 Sections- 10.3, 10.4, 10.5,
10.6, 10.8, Table 10.3 Chapter 11 Sections- 11.5.3 Chapter 12: 12.5 Chapter 17
Supplementary material table 17.1 Data processing or treatment: The sectoral
chapters (Chapters 6-11) assessed the literature in terms of the impacts of each
of the shortlisted sectoral mitigation options on the 17 United Nation’s
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This assessment is qualitatively and uses
three signs: • ‘+’ to denote positive interaction only (synergies) between
mitigation option and the SDG, • ‘-’ to denote negative interaction only
(trade-offs) between mitigation option and the SDG and • ‘±’ to denote mixed
interactions between mitigation option and the SDG. In some cases, where there
is gap in literature, these are left blank denoting that these impacts have not
been assessed in the literature. To support these signs, brief statements are
provided followed by uncertainty qualifiers in the supplementary table of
Chapter 17. These uncertainty qualifiers denote the confidence levels (low,
medium and high). The assessment also recognises that the interactions between
mitigation options and the SDGs are context-specific and depends on scale, so a
detailed explanation on context specificity/scale is provided in the
supplementary table of Chapter 17.
Purpose:
Data used by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) authors and
supplied for archiving to MetadataWorks Ltd by the Technical Support Unit (TSU)
for IPCC Working Group III (WG III).
Accessibility
Access
Access Service:
Available for download from the IPCC Data Catalogue.
Format:
application/vnd.ms-excel
Language:
en
Usage
Resource Creator:
- Halsnæs, K.
- Some, S.
- Singh, U.
- Clarke, L.
- Wei, Y. -M.
- Garg, A.
- Nabuurs, G. -J.
- Mrabet, R.
- Emmet-Booth, J.
- Kilkis, S.
- Lwasa, S.
- Seto, K. C.
- Keller, M.
- Pathak, M.
- Mirasgedis, S.
- Cabeza, L. F.
- Bai, Q.
- Jaramillo, P.
- Ribeiro, S. K.
- Newman, P.
- Santos, A.
- Nugroho, S. B.
- Acquaye, A.
- Bashmakov, I. A.
- Nilsson, L. J.
Origin
Name:
IPCC Data Catalogue